Monadology In search of the unifying principle. Leibniz This guy is being sucked up a glass tube. This guy is being sucked up a glass tube. This guy is being sucked up a glass tube. This guy is being sucked up a glass tube. This guy is being sucked up a glass tube. This guy is being sucked up a glass tube.

Monadology in 2008, and Nominations for Comments of the Year

January 4, 2009

It’s a humbling experience to read my own writing. I find it frequently unsatisfying, hasty, and needlessly ornate. In this, it is accurately indicative of most of my thought. It’s harder to be embarrassed by my thought, however, as it is more easily propped up by illusion: I can think of myself as defined by the best of my thoughts, letting all of the shoddiness and error that goes along with them slip back into the stream of my consciousness like so many too-small rainbow trout. Writing is not a straightforward setting-to-paper of pre-existing thoughts, it’s a task of composition, of a different kind of thinking that is carefully and deliberately aggregate. I can have an experience, the germ of an idea about how to express it, and the imaginative emotion of having expressed that idea in writing all in a moment—this is what many people mean by “books written in their heads”—but it is an illusion, one that many people like myself rely on for propping up the high estimations we have of our own intelligence and creativity. Because of this, I’m trying not to give up on writing. My writing may be depressingly truth-telling in its revelation of my character, but it’s only vanity that makes truth-telling depressing. I’m grateful for the many of you that have read my writing for the years I’ve run Monadology, through both the good and the bad.

I’ve been looking back over my posts this year. I was surprised to remember that it all started with the Democratic Primaries; politics occupied my attention earlier and more fully than it ever has before. Though the relevance of the twists and turns of that season seem diminished in consequence, the aggregate result of it is no less important and marvelous now than it was then: Barack Obama secured the party nomination and then the presidency by adroitly winning over countless people, like me, not naturally inclined toward the Democratic party. And in the short time since his win, he has shown himself to be a measured, confident, cautious leader. I’m very grateful for him, honestly: I wouldn’t want to be President of the United States now for the world. I’m also grateful because I suspect that McCain wanted to be President, period. If he had to be President during a crisis like this one, so be it. Obama, though, has persuaded me that he actually wants this opportunity. As he told Jon Stewart, if you got into politics because you wanted to make a difference, now is the time to be President.

The big story of the year for me as a blogger is that despite having an unfocused, not-terribly-active blog, Andrew Sullivan linked to two (Comparing Abortion and Torture, Are Video Games Too Easy?) of my entries on the Daily Dish, one of the most highly trafficked political blogs in the world. It’s a rare (for me, unique) privilege to have a writer whom I admire as much as I do Sullivan read things that I’ve written and pay me the compliment of finding them interesting.

As usual, however, the best writing on this blog has been by commenters. The eloquence and insight of the many visitors to the site is my favorite aspect of my blog, and the quality of the comments here has gone remarked on many times by others, particularly in the many blogged responses to the two posts of mine that got unexpected exposure. As such, I’d like to open up nominations for Comments of the Year. Every comment has an anchor icon right after the date and time it was posted that is a link to the permanent URL for that comment; if you can, please provide that link along with any quoted text in your comment. I will not be selecting a winner; the idea is to create a list of particularly notable and worthwhile comments. The purpose is just to have a chance to be reminded of some of the best thoughts and arguments that have been made here, and to give the nominated commenters the pleasure of knowing that their efforts are appreciated.

Comments

1

I also recommend checking out HB’s archive to re-read some of his excellent posts. I particularly recommend Friendship and Poetry, though I would caution you against Love, Race, and Commitment.

2

But Love, Race, and Commitment is the best!

3

I’m only now really appreciating LR&C.

4

I was able to freshly appreciate it, too, this time around. It’s something of a masterpiece. An evil masterpiece.

5

Nate. I’m by no means a regular contributor here but I look in often and find the articles by you and your fellow contributors interesting and highly rewarding. I consistently find myself having to re-work my ideas on certain subjects having digested the thoughts expressed here, and that’s no bad thing.

I hope Monadology continues in it’s present form for some time. It’s a little gem.

-Kevin

6

I’m exempt, of course, from the comment contest, since it has been well established that I do not have favorites. I will just add a sarcastic word about that really annoying commenter Robbie, who is so goddamned moderate in his tone and reasoning all the time. Where does he get off?

I will also confess that reading my own writing gives me an inordinate amount of pleasure. Everyone else here already knew that, of course, but I want you to know that I know you know.

Finally, I’ll join in the praise of myself for Love, Race, and Commitment. I’m pleased on re-reading that I managed to make an argument that is so damn confusing, even to me. I feel like Shakespeare must have felt after writing Orlando’s love poetry in As You Like It: who knew it would be so pleasurable to write badly?

7

It would have been very helpful if I would have known this at the beginning of the year, then I could have kept track of the comments for the purpose of nominating them.

Thanks Ned Plimpton!

8
… that really annoying commenter Robbie, who is so goddamned moderate in his tone and reasoning all the time.

Hmmm… I’m not sure I could agree with this in quite these terms. Maybe — “somewhat” annoying commenter, who “tends to be” “rather” moderate in his tone and reasoning “much of” the time. Yeah, that’s more like it.

9

Also, though no one comment comes immediately to mind and I don’t just now have the time to go hunting for one, I would nominate some comment by Martin G. Keep ‘em comin’, Martin!

10

@KDD, aka Kevin, aka Pyramus: I consider it a remarkable privilege to have my two best friends from CatStevens.com still check in on me from time to time. I’m pleased that you enjoy the conversations at Monadology, and am thrilled whenever you pause to add to them yourself.

Also: I was given the Criterion collection edition of Seven Samurai for Christmas, and immediately thought of you.

@Everyone: Sorry — somehow I thought this exercise would be more fun when I was sitting in a coffee shop early in the morning. I suppose, in very loose terms, I just meant to remind the many people of very different views who comment on my blog that I appreciate and am changed by their arguments, even (especially) when I disagree.