<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Monadology</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://monadology.net/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:,2008:/1</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/mt1/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1" title="Monadology" />
    <updated>2008-06-24T18:18:55Z</updated>
    <subtitle>In search of the unifying principle.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.01</generator>
 

<entry>
    <title>St. John&apos;s College Website</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://monadology.net/archives/st_johns_college_website.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/mt1/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=990" title="St. John's College Website" />
    <id>tag:monadology.net,2008://1.990</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-24T18:15:50Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-24T18:18:55Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Thank the gods, the St. John&apos;s College website has been redesigned. It&apos;s not perfect, nor perfectly suited to my taste, but at least it&apos;s professional again. There&apos;s lots of padding and even the Flash piece on the homepage is tasteful....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nate</name>
        <uri>http://monadology.net</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://monadology.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thank the gods, the <a href="http://www.stjohnscollege.edu/">St. John's College website</a> has been redesigned.  It's not perfect, nor perfectly suited to my taste, but at least it's professional again.  There's lots of padding and even the Flash piece on the homepage is tasteful.  Maybe I'll do a write-up on my specific reactions to it, but in general... I just feel much better about the world now.  Anyone know anything about the process?  Who did the design?</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>What We Praise</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://monadology.net/archives/what_we_praise.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/mt1/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=989" title="What We Praise" />
    <id>tag:monadology.net,2008://1.989</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-16T17:45:48Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-16T17:54:48Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Andrew Sullivan quotes an anecdote from Cass R. Sunstein about Barack Obama. Regardless of one&apos;s particular take on Obama the man, I can&apos;t help but feel some amount of hope when the world takes notice of and praises things that...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nate</name>
        <uri>http://monadology.net</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://monadology.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Andrew Sullivan quotes <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/06/what-obama-brin.html">an anecdote</a> from <a href="http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/open_university/archive/2008/06/12/obama-the-university-of-chicago-democrat.aspx">Cass R. Sunstein</a> about Barack Obama.  Regardless of one's particular take on Obama the man, I can't help but feel some amount of hope when the world takes notice of and praises things that seem to me to be genuinely noble.  The fact that there are a certain amount of people who are simply delighted at the possibility of having a president who listens well, who considers other possibilities, and has a genuinely investigative temperament makes me feel slightly better about things.  One of my biggest hopes, in fact, for an Obama presidency is that he will help to subtly shift our expectations of our leaders.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Dreams</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://monadology.net/archives/dreams_1.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/mt1/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=988" title="Dreams" />
    <id>tag:monadology.net,2008://1.988</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-16T16:58:37Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-16T17:14:11Z</updated>
    
    <summary>What follows is a recounting of a dream I had last night. I&apos;m putting it in the extended entry so that no one who is uninterested in such things is forced to read it. I&apos;m not sure it serves any...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nate</name>
        <uri>http://monadology.net</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://monadology.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>What follows is a recounting of a dream I had last night.  I'm putting it in the extended entry so that no one who is uninterested in such things is forced to read it.  I'm not sure it serves any purpose other than personal.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>I had one of the worst dreams I can remember last night: I was in a meeting with a number of teenagers and another adult in a small room with red and orange furniture.  The adult was counseling one of the teenagers (who was, maybe, 13 years old), and he said something like: "Look, if we're going to be able to work with you, and you want to make progress, I need you to confess that you murdered [names of two very close friends of mine]."</p>

<p>I stood up and raced out of the room through a dark house.  I ran into someone and said, "Has anything happened?"  I was told that nothing had.  Another person came into the dark hallway where we were standing.  I asked again, "Has anything happened?"  Silence.  "Has anything happened to [names again expunged]?"  The person blinked, and said slowly, "Yes, they've been murdered."</p>

<p>I remember watching myself, as if from above, as wracking sobs shook my body.  Each one seemed like a separate event, as if every nuanced aspect of the loss were striking me independently.  I asked if their kids were okay: they were.  Then I stumbled into a garage, where I saw my friends in the front seat of a car, dead and bloody.  I kept thinking: "All this because they tried to help him."</p>

<p>I woke up with a feeling of shock: of course it had been a dream, I realized, but I lay awake for some time trying to overcome my revulsion at myself for having created such a horror for myself.</p>

<p>The dream has stuck with me all morning, and I had to force myself not to call one of my friends for some kind of reassurance that they were, in fact, still alive.  Not that I believe dreams are prophetic, but because I needed some way to shake off the last remnants of the feeling of grief and shock I had.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Canadians: Weak-minded</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://monadology.net/archives/philosophical-slant/canadiansweakminded.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/mt1/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=987" title="Canadians: Weak-minded" />
    <id>tag:monadology.net,2008://1.987</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-12T04:40:39Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-12T04:52:53Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Canada, like much of the western world, has a thought police. That is, they don&apos;t believe in the concept of free speech as defined by the United States Supreme Court&apos;s interpretation of the First Amendment. Now we know why: &quot;Canadians...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>HB</name>
        <uri>http://monadology.net/archives-hb.php</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Philosophical Slant" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://monadology.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Canada, like much of the western world, has a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/12/us/12hate.html?partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">thought police</a>. That is, they don't believe in the concept of free speech as defined by the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment.  Now we know why:</p>

<p><em>"Canadians do not have a cast-iron stomach for offensive speech," Mr. Gratl said in a telephone interview. "We don't subscribe to a marketplace of ideas. Americans as a whole are more tough-minded and more prepared for verbal combat."</em></p>

<p>This statement pretty much captures why I endorse the modern, extreme form of free speech that developed in American jurisprudence over the 20th century. Limiting speech, even hate speech, makes your people wimpy. It's a vicious cycle.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Pet Peeves</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://monadology.net/archives/pet_peeves.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/mt1/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=986" title="Pet Peeves" />
    <id>tag:monadology.net,2008://1.986</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-05T14:09:29Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-05T14:22:42Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Some pet peeves that I should probably get over. (But most likely won&apos;t.) Anyone ever using the word &quot;squee&quot;. People talking about their brain, and how weird/funny/strange it is. Thanks, I get how smart you think you are. Use of...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nate</name>
        <uri>http://monadology.net</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://monadology.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Some pet peeves that I should probably get over.  (But most likely won't.)</p>


<ul>
<li>Anyone <em>ever</em> using the word "squee".</li>
<li>People talking about their brain, and how weird/funny/strange it is.  Thanks, I get how smart you think you are.</li>
<li>Use of the phrase "Who does that?" in a rhetorical manner to imply that things not practiced by a sufficient quantity of people are somehow invalid.</li>
<li>People who walk slowly.</li>
<li>99% of political cartoons.  Stupid bully pulpits.</li>
<li>People who continue to say "bless you" every time after a string of consecutive sneezes.  Once a day is sufficient.</li>
<li>Professional sports.</li>
<li>Overly dismissive and self-satisfied lists. (D'oh.)</li>
</ul>

]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Ebert FTW</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://monadology.net/archives/ebert_ftw.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/mt1/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=985" title="Ebert FTW" />
    <id>tag:monadology.net,2008://1.985</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-03T20:46:21Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-03T20:48:21Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Ebert&apos;s got some great lines in a recent blog post, responding to a reader who agreed that the Sex and the City movie sucked, but urged him to check out the series should he have the opportunity: I regret, Ian,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nate</name>
        <uri>http://monadology.net</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://monadology.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Ebert's got some great lines in <a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/06/sex_and_the_city_dog.html">a recent blog post</a>, responding to a reader who agreed that the <cite>Sex and the City</cite> movie sucked, but urged him to check out the series should he have the opportunity:</p>

<blockquote><p>I regret, Ian, that I will never have the opportunity. Wild horses could not drag me to the opportunity. <span class="caps">SATC </span>is so definitely not my cup of tea that, for me, it is not tea at all, and does not come in a cup.</p></blockquote>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Family Guy Sucks</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://monadology.net/archives/family_guy_sucks.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/mt1/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=984" title="Family Guy Sucks" />
    <id>tag:monadology.net,2008://1.984</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-02T14:59:32Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-02T15:14:43Z</updated>
    
    <summary>I was horrified by South Park when it came on the air. I still find many episodes too disgusting to watch, and a significant amount of the humor is just dumb. But I must admit to having been wooed over...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nate</name>
        <uri>http://monadology.net</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://monadology.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I was horrified by <em>South Park</em> when it came on the air.  I still find many episodes too disgusting to watch, and a significant amount of the humor is just dumb.  But I must admit to having been wooed over the years by the sardonic vision of Parker and Stone.  I suppose it's the unrepentant preachiness that attracted my notice first.  (Whole plot points are devoted to letting characters say something repeatedly that has a literal meaning in the story and a more obvious contextual meaning outside it.  Example: in one episode, police have to negotiate with Tom Cruise to come out of hiding in the closet of Stan Marsh's room.  I can't count the number of times they were able to have characters say, "Tom Cruise, come out of the closet!")  For me, this endless succession of bones to pick and axes to grind makes the show's stories much more interesting than they would otherwise be.  And, frankly, I think the show's kept up its quality (such as it is) remarkably well over the years.</p>

<p>It was a pleasure, then, to watch <em>The Cartoon Wars</em> episodes recently and have them skewer <em>The Family Guy</em> so beautifully, a show about which I cannot say enough ill.  You can get an excellent <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Family_Guy#Family_Guy_vs._South_Park">summary of their criticisms here</a>, or just go <a href="http://www.southparkstudios.com/episodes/103230">watch those episodes</a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Iron Man / Seven Samurai</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://monadology.net/archives/iron_man_seven_samurai.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/mt1/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=983" title="Iron Man / Seven Samurai" />
    <id>tag:monadology.net,2008://1.983</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-12T14:13:28Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-12T14:30:41Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Iron Man, 3/5 monads: Iron Man is probably the best and most accurate transfer of comic to film of any comic-book movie to-date. Its script follows worn, familiar cadences and the plot arc of its hero--in which a successful inventor...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nate</name>
        <uri>http://monadology.net</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://monadology.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Iron Man, 3/5 monads:</strong></p>

<p><em>Iron Man</em> is probably the best and most accurate transfer of comic to film of any comic-book movie to-date.  Its script follows worn, familiar cadences and the plot arc of its hero--in which a successful inventor and weapons dealer discovers that maybe weapons development <em>isn't</em> the purely humanitarian endeavor he thought it was--is just about the right level of profundity for me-at-thirteen.  This is, in my opinion, a completely authentic reproduction of the level of quality of the majority of Marvel comics, and certainly <em>Iron Man</em>, who was never one of my favorites.  But the extra time and attention that a feature-length film gets made this formula unusually well-crafted.  Its familiar tropes just work a little bit better here than they do in most comic-book movies.  In fact, the whole thing felt like a genre getting really comfortable with itself: no, this isn't their bid for Oscar glory.  (They tried that with <em>Hulk</em>, a substantial movie by Ang Lee that alienated everyone but me and the Onion AV Club.)  But this is the first movie I've seen that is almost devoid of any personal, artistic directorial flair (unlike <em>Spider-Man</em>) that's also... pretty good.</p>

<p>If Marvel can duplicate that in expanding Iron Man's world (his character begs to be in collaboration... there's just not that much room to explore with him) as they clearly intend to do (stay through the credits... <span class="caps">ALWAYS </span>stay through the credits), I think they will richly deserve the success they get.</p>

<p><strong>Seven Samurai, 5/5 monads:</strong></p>

<p>Oh, hey, someone else watched <em>Seven Samurai</em> for the first time and thought it kicked ass.  <span class="caps">ALERT THE PRESSES. </span> Yes, I'm late to the party.  Very, very late.  But, still: it's a delight to watch such a wonderful film for the first time.  I didn't realize, of course, that it was over three hours long when I picked it for Koine: this was the first time we didn't have time for a discussion.  But it was wonderful to sit in a room full of people, all of us enthralled by the flickering grey light that recreated for us that fascinating, beautiful village with its seven guests.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Pro-Life for Obama</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://monadology.net/archives/prolife_for_obama.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/mt1/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=982" title="Pro-Life for Obama" />
    <id>tag:monadology.net,2008://1.982</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-07T13:16:53Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-07T13:24:11Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Doug Kmiec, a pro-life Roman Catholic, reaffirms and explains his support of Barack Obama. Among other thoughts that seem, to me, to be sound: &quot;I believe that my faith calls upon me at this time to focus on new efforts...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nate</name>
        <uri>http://monadology.net</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://monadology.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.catholic.org/politics/story.php?id=27820">Doug Kmiec, a pro-life Roman Catholic, reaffirms and explains his support of Barack Obama</a>.  Among other thoughts that seem, to me, to be sound: "I believe that my faith calls upon me at this time to focus on new efforts and untried paths to reduce abortion practice in America."</p>

<p>Also: I like Catholic Online's favicon.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>M&apos;s Mix</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://monadology.net/archives/ms_mix.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/mt1/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=981" title="M's Mix" />
    <id>tag:monadology.net,2008://1.981</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-01T23:24:22Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-01T23:28:02Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Mirabai&apos;s new mix, which you should all have been informed of by this feed, is something to write home about. Just the right combination of songs that impress upon one the eclectic tastes of the mixer, songs of delightful novelty,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nate</name>
        <uri>http://monadology.net</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://monadology.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nepomuk.muxtape.com/">Mirabai's new mix</a>, which you should all have been informed of by <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/MonadologicalMuxtapes">this feed</a>, is something to write home about.  Just the right combination of songs that impress upon one the eclectic tastes of the mixer, songs of delightful novelty, and songs that are simply beautiful.  My own current mix manages to turn a bunch of my favorite songs into a jarring and uncomfortable whole.  Time to begin a new one.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Not that I necessarily agree with this...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://monadology.net/archives/not_that_i_necessarily_agree_w.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/mt1/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=980" title="Not that I necessarily agree with this..." />
    <id>tag:monadology.net,2008://1.980</id>
    
    <published>2008-04-29T14:28:16Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-29T05:04:47Z</updated>
    
    <summary>In fact, I really don&apos;t know what to make of it: apparently, wearing shoes isn&apos;t good for you. It disrupts the natural muscular and biomechanical rhythms we&apos;ve already got built within us and makes us walk in ways that are...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>HB</name>
        <uri>http://monadology.net/archives-hb.php</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://monadology.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In fact, I really don't know what to make of it: apparently, wearing shoes <a href="http://nymag.com/health/features/46213/">isn't good</a> for you. It disrupts the natural muscular and biomechanical rhythms we've already got built within us and makes us walk in ways that are bad for our joints and muscles. (Actually, the phenomenological description of walking in the article, as an immediate response to the ground producing what we feel as balance, is pretty good.) Add this to the list of things like <a href="http://www.earth360.com/diet_paleodiet_balzer.html">grains</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_oil">petroleum</a>, and even the <a href="http://www.culturechange.org/cms/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=107&amp;Itemid=1">combination</a> <a href="http://nysun.com/news/food-crisis-eclipsing-climate-change">of the two</a> through which modern science is now vindicating nature and critiquing sometimes very basic and certainly widespread instances of human contrivance. Now, in itself, that's really not too surprising; science has, after all, been pointing out errors in our contrivance for some time, telling us for instance that bathing is in fact not unhealthy and that lead-based medicines are (although the last lesson <a href="http://www.nationalautismassociation.org/thimerosal.php">hasn't always stuck</a>). I guess what has struck me over the two years or so is how modern science is now describing--or at least having certain findings publicized--how very basic parts of modern civilization are inherently contrary to human biological pr planet-wide climatological processes.  Using contrivance to make our lives easier in the short term turns out to have destructive or at least limiting long-term consequences. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>So what's the right response to this information? Use more science to try to <a href="http://www.terraplana.com/root-p-740.html?colour=57the">combine</a> aims of contrivance with the natural processes of our bodies? Move to the <a href="http://www.georgesteinmetz.com/index.php?section=11&amp;page=view_photos">rain forest</a>? Eat lots of meat yourself and at the <a href="http://nysun.com/news/food-crisis-eclipsing-climate-changeof">expense</a> people who live elsewhere and after you? Make farming <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/16/fashion/16farmer.html">hip again</a>?</p>

<p>Actually, even posing that question about the right response makes me despair of anyone finding a solution that will be sustainable enough to sustain our civilization. Every contrivance we make has unintended consequences, many of them negative, and we cannot fully know them. I can't help but think of a parallel to quantum mechanics, which to my mind has as its primary lesson the proof of what we already knew: that matter, qua matter, is in fact unknowable, because to make progress in the field, we have to predicate absurdities. (We have to redefine knowing, or wave our hands, in order to proceed in quantum mechanics, which is fine, but at least science has to acknowledge that it's doing this.) Likewise does postmodernity in science tell us that contriving our own preservation is impossible because contrivance, as the product of our limited knowledge of practical things, can only hope to achieve what we know to be best, and we will only know that partially.</p>

<p>Thanks to <a href="http://cubswn.blogspot.com/">Sammy</a> for pointing the way. </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Wright, Wright, Wright</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://monadology.net/archives/wright_wright_wright.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/mt1/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=979" title="Wright, Wright, Wright" />
    <id>tag:monadology.net,2008://1.979</id>
    
    <published>2008-04-29T04:02:41Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-29T04:15:28Z</updated>
    
    <summary>I&apos;m sick of it, Andrew. I haven&apos;t had time to read or watch Wright&apos;s comments in full, but the ones Mr. Sullivan quotes are clearly within the sphere of opinions that could be held by good people, by people with...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nate</name>
        <uri>http://monadology.net</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://monadology.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/04/wrights-poison.html">sick of it, Andrew</a>.  I haven't had time to read or watch Wright's comments in full, but the ones Mr. Sullivan quotes are clearly within the sphere of opinions that could be held by good people, by people with arguments, people whose arguments--even if wrong--might actually improve the world if we had the kind of society that could deal with consideration of them.  I fear that the main thing Sullivan--and so many others--are reacting to is that they cannot tolerate a world without heroes and villains.  All victims must be <em>unequivocally</em> righteous; all villains must be <em>unequivocally</em> repudiated.  American public will is like aggressive chemotherapy: we care little for the wholesale destruction of healthy humanity if it's anywhere near something we deem a cancer.</p>

<p>At any rate, if I go on to read Wright's full remarks and the next line is something like, "All white people must die," I'll probably have some back-pedaling to do.  But am I really, <em>really</em> expected to get furious at this man because he reiterated the accusation that America might have reaped what it sowed in 9/11?  This is the opposite of justifying terrorism, or saying America "deserved" it; on the contrary, it's an unequivocal attack on terrorism of any kind.</p>

<p>I <em>am</em> a bit angry at Wright for not sitting down and being quiet.  Some of us would really like this Obama guy to be President, okay?</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>My Totem</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://monadology.net/archives/my_totem.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/mt1/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=978" title="My Totem" />
    <id>tag:monadology.net,2008://1.978</id>
    
    <published>2008-04-24T13:13:21Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-24T13:14:41Z</updated>
    
    <summary>It&apos;s a pleasure to be reminded, sometimes, that I&apos;m named after an animal that really fucks up other animals&apos; shit....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nate</name>
        <uri>http://monadology.net</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://monadology.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's a pleasure to be reminded, sometimes, that I'm named after an animal <a href="http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e93_1208562044">that really fucks up other animals' shit</a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Feed your monad</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://monadology.net/archives/feed_your_monad.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/mt1/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=977" title="Feed your monad" />
    <id>tag:monadology.net,2008://1.977</id>
    
    <published>2008-04-19T13:49:01Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-19T13:53:49Z</updated>
    
    <summary>In response to a request from our esteemed colleague Robbie, I&apos;ve created an RSS feed just for comments. (You can also find this by clicking on the RSS icon in your address bar.) Wonder no longer if I&apos;ve waited six...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nate</name>
        <uri>http://monadology.net</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://monadology.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In response to a request from our esteemed colleague Robbie, I've created <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/MonadologyCommentsFeed">an <span class="caps">RSS </span>feed just for comments</a>.  (You can also find this by clicking on the <span class="caps">RSS </span>icon in your address bar.)  Wonder no longer if I've waited six months to reply to something you wrote.  Those who end up using this feed should feel free to let me know if any alterations would make it more usable.</p>

<p>I've also created a feed of <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/MonadologicalMuxtapes">all Monadological Muxtapes</a> using the crazy <a href="http://pipes.yahoo.com">Yahoo! Pipes</a>.  (Yahoo! Pipes is crazy fun to play around with, by the way.)  It should let us keep track of when people are adding new music to their mixes, which I intend to do presently to test it.  Keep me posted if you are <em>not</em> on here and would like to be.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>On Superman</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://monadology.net/archives/on_superman.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://monadology.net/mt1/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=976" title="On Superman" />
    <id>tag:monadology.net,2008://1.976</id>
    
    <published>2008-04-16T16:32:11Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-16T16:39:19Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[Notes for a future entry. This article: Why Superman Will Always Suck. Glad it was written: Superman needs to be talked about. Disagree for various reasons. Power given &gt; power earned. Yes. Yes! How fundamentally human that is. We are...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nate</name>
        <uri>http://monadology.net</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://monadology.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Notes for a future entry.  This article: <a href="http://www.bamkapow.com/bk-feature-why-superman-will-always-suck-1189-p.html">Why Superman Will Always Suck</a>.</p>

<p>Glad it was written: Superman needs to be talked about.  Disagree for various reasons.</p>


<ul>
<li>Power given &gt; power earned.  Yes.  Yes!  How fundamentally human that is.  We are powerful beyond imagining, with no idea why on earth we should have it, or how we could possibly merit it.</li>
</ul>




<ul>
<li>Superman chooses vulnerability.  Dispassion toward others would leave him invulnerable; concern for others makes him mortal.  Superman doesn't need kryptonite to be defeatable, he just needs Lois, his parents, Jimmy, &amp;c.</li>
</ul>




<ul>
<li>Moral absolutism.  Many interesting stories already written on this angle.  Frank Miller often uses Superman as someone able to be made miserably complicit in the evil of others because of his sympathy, or moral simplicity.  Makes him the perfect foil for Batman, who is cynical and pragmatic.  But frightening.  Superman's weakness is that he sees so clearly the way the world ought to be.  Deeply sympathetic.</li>
</ul>

]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

